Inter-Dimensional ETs and Multiverse UFO Theory
A Neo-Gnostic, Pagan Pseudo-Religion

Adapted from Daniel O'Connor's book "Only Man Bears his Image" with permission

Universal laws of physics render previous ideas of flying saucers coming from far away impossible because the universal laws of physics apply to hypothetical aliens too. They cannot come from other planets because of:

• Insurmaountable distances: even at the speed of light
• Space debris: even paint chip sized flecks would generate atomic bomb type explosions
• Energy necessary: would require impossible loads. Each turn, acelleration and decelleration compounds unfathomable energy requirements
• Any biological entity would be zapped: by radiation as a result of the above
• Any movement of these ships on earth would cause atomic bomb like energy requirements for every turn
• etc.

In the 1820s virtually all public media were peddling an alien populated moon. When this was proved wrong the same phenomenon occured in the 1890s where the NY Times and all media were peddling alien life on Mars and all the other planets. Most lay people believed it except faithful Christians who knew it was unbiblical.

Science caught up with their fancies and proved them wrong. So they retreated and claimed aliens were now on distant planets in other galaxies. Hollywood, mainstream media and achedemia peddled that for 50 years and now the astrophysics community has caught up with that fantacy and proved interstellar and intergallactal travel impossible.

So they have retreated again. ET promoters are now moving to a new theory about UFOs traversing from different dimensions. Aliens now coveniently just appear in front of us from some other dimension. Presto, no need for scientific proof.

Interdimentional universe: a theory or a religion?

The six steps of the scientific method are:

1. Ask a question about something observed
2. Do background research to learn what is already known about the topic
3. Construct an hypothesis
4. Experiment to test the hypothesis
5. Analyze the data from the experiment and drawing conclusions, and
6. Communicate the results to others.

When ET promoters realize that even wormholes, teleportation, etc. will not succeed, they resort to one last strategy: religion. Not “religion” in the true sense of the term, but a perversion thereof—a neo-Gnostic and Pagan pseudo-Religion that unashamedly traffics in the very mysteries (arbitrarily called by other names) that are, by definition, within the exclusive domain of Faith, while at the same time flatly contradicting themselves by insisting their views are exempt from theological (and even philosophical) scrutiny.

Although parapsychology is a realm almost entirely permeated by unadulterated pseudoscientific nonsense, even there an effort exists to present the discourse in scientific terms and to engage in scientific studies.

However, an increasingly common view—among those Ufologists who concede that interstellar travel is not plausible, and that SETI’s “Great Silence” rules out “traditional” notions of aliens, that the content of UFO sightings cannot possibly be made to work with “traditional” notions of ETs, etc.—is to simply esotericize belief in ETs to the extreme.

They posit the beings visiting us are actually “Ultraterrestrials;” that is, some form of beings from “another dimension” who need not travel through space to arrive here, but need merely “intersect” or “phase” or “vibrate” with us at will. As the fable goes, these beings are not physically traversing the expanse of space to reach us, but are rather entering our “dimension” from another one.

We will deal with the patently demonic spiritual realities that are signaled here in other articles. Presently, our task is only to briefly note how devoid of any scientific basis such claims are, in order to point out that whoever promotes the notion of “interdimensional” visitors has merely posited a religious belief—albeit one devoid of any basis, any prophet, any morality, any creed; in a word, any truth.

Although “The Interdimensional Hypothesis” is now pervasive, a pioneer of this brand of alien belief is the famous Ufologist we have already quoted earlier, Jacques Vallée. Considering his primacy in forming modern UFOlogy, we will delve into this aspect of his teachings—in order to warn against their darkness and deception—in a later chapter. At this point, we need only define his thesis.

It bears emphasizing first, however, that what follows does not detract from Valleé’s cutting critiques of one brand (still the most common) of ET belief we discussed earlier. As noted, this scholar is doubtless the world’s most learned expert on UFO sightings, and from this extensive knowledge he has rightly concluded that the entire modern milieu of ET belief, which anticipates the arrival of interstellar-space-traversing aliens in spaceships, is fraudulent and illogical to the core. That he is correct in this assessment does not lend credibility to the alternative thesis he proposes, for that proposition itself is not only entirely empty, but also stands squarely outside of his own domain of experience and expertise.

Cutting as his critiques are, this is the point at which Dr. Vallée’s wisdom ends. For despite his valid exhortations, and book titles such as “Messengers of Deception: UFO Contacts and Cults,” Vallée has no interest in exposing the real deceptions at play, much less safeguarding his readers against them. Like a Mormon one day waking up to realize that Joseph Smith was not a true prophet, and proceeding not to enter true Christianity, but instead to abandon Christianity altogether for outright Paganism—so too Jacques Vallée and his ilk would only have their readers jump out of the frying pan and into the fire.

Vallée, ironically, describes himself as a “heretic among heretics”; the Ufologists being the “heretics”—a group he belongs to but from which he often dissents. Departing from “mainstream” Ufologists, he proposes that “UFOs” reveal a phenomenon that has been with humanity throughout history and cannot be entirely explained in empirical, scientific terms.

He focuses heavily on arguing that UFOs are entities representing “levels of consciousness” that reside outside of “our dimensions” and accordingly (we are expected to accept) have power over the latter, even functioning as some manner of “control system” for humanity.

Discerning readers will have already recognized that Vallée is simply describing demons, but neither Vallée nor his readers recognize this, even while pretending they do. For example, Vallée passingly acknowledges UFO phenomena’s “striking parallel to the intercourse with angels, demons, and elves in earlier ages,”[193] but only by way of employing the standard modernist scholarly dismissal of those very themes.

This is evidenced by his inclusion of “elves” in the same breath as “demons,” both of which are treated as mere relics of “earlier ages,” when in fact elves are just one of the many guises the demons assume (along with “aliens”). Vallée insists that both are simply expositions of one superior and overarching reality, which can only be described in terms of “interdimensionality,” a notion conveniently devoid of any objective meaning, and which can be exempted from scrutiny from any concrete field of study that exists.

What this all amounts to is a strategy we have already seen regularly employed by many ET promoters: insisting upon having their cake and eating it too. They want to be regarded as scientific (in a futile attempt to evade the charge that they have simply founded a new religion), but they do not want to submit their propositions to the actual laws of science. They want to pooh-pooh traditional religion, while proposing theses that are, by all beyond-semantic accounts, identical to those proposed by every other founder of false religions throughout history.

For example, Vallée teaches that UFOs constitute a “control system” for humanity, but neglects to concede that a “control system” implies a controller who designed and operates the system. Thus, Vallée has simply explicitly crafted a new religion, with the “control system administrator” as the deity and the “UFOs” as the prophets. The methods of operations of this religion are not Scriptures and Liturgies, Creeds and Sacraments, or Prayer and Morality, but rather unmoored esoteric ramblings which are free to redefine themselves each month in accordance with whatever empty terminology has become trendy in science fiction movies or viral podcasts.

In contrast to the proposals of men like Vallée (although he is one of the pioneers of this fad, he is far from the only developer and promoter of the “Interdimensional Hypothesis”), we should consult qualified scientists’ explanations of the silliness of arguing for “multiple dimensions” or “multiple universes.”

One recent scholarly tome, entitled Universe or Multiverse?, and published by Cambridge University Press in 2009, is dedicated to promoting this idea of the “multiverse” (though officially abiding by the customary academic assurance the issue is simply being “explored,” thereby “encouraging further inquiry,” but without presenting conclusions).

Even this volume, however, evidently felt duty-bound to include some skeptical remarks. Remarkably, this task was fulfilled by Professor Paul Davies, a physicist who works in astrobiology and held a prominent position within SETI (the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence). This scientist concedes:

... multiverse models ... are ontologically equivalent to naive deism ... dressed up in scientific language. Both appeal to an infinite unknown, invisible and unknowable system. Both require an infinite amount of information to be discarded just to explain the (finite) universe we observe. It would be instructive to quantify and compare the degree of credulity we might attach to various competing multiverse and theological models using algorithmic complexity theory. It seems likely that some versions of both the multiverse and nave deism would be equivalently complex and, in most cases, infinitely complex. They may employ different terminology but, in essence, both explanations are the same. ... It is basically just a religious conviction rather than a scientific argument. ...(§28.3.5)

Taken to its logical extreme, the multiverse explanation is a convincing argument for the existence of (a rather old-fashioned form of) God! This is certainly ironical, since it was partly to do away with such a God that the multiverse was originally invoked. Worse still, there is no end to the hierarchy of levels in which worlds and designers can be embedded ... ad infinitum: gods and worlds, creators and creatures, in an infinite regress, embedded within each other. We confront something more bewildering than an infinite tower of virtual turtles: a turtle fractal of virtual observers, gods and universes in limitlessly complex inter-relationships. If this is the ultimate reality, there would seem to be little point in pursuing scientific inquiry at all into such matters. Indeed, to take such a view is as pointless as solipsism [the radical, absurdist idea that nothing at all exists but one’s own self].

My point is that to follow the multiverse theory to its logical extreme means effectively abandoning the notion of a rationally ordered real world altogether, in favour of an infinitely complex charade, where the very notion of ‘explanation’ is meaningless ... [a] ‘fantasy-verse’ of arbitrary virtual realities, whimsically generated by a pseudo-Deity designer. (§28.3.6) Dr. Davies’ observations above could just as easily be presented (if using other words) by anyone with common sense. Assuredly, the moment one posits such notions as “the multiverse” or “other dimensions,” he has, ipso facto, declared a religious conviction—one, at that, devoid of value. Nevertheless, I present this scholar’s arguments here since they derive from a renowned physicist and SETI researcher in a work printed by a prestigious academic publishing house. For such a man as he to describe multiverse theory so starkly resembles the denunciations from a man such as Vallée, decrying the “UFO Whistleblowers” as the charlatans they are. Only an idealogue could fail to recognize the accuracy of such reproof. Especially noteworthy is Dr. Davies’ observation that, in multiverse theory,

“there is no end to the hierarchy of levels in which worlds and designers can be embedded...ad infinitum...”

Indeed, the trend we have seen and doubtless will continue to see is as predictable as the dialogue of a cheap soap opera. In the early 20th century, it was considered edgy to propose that time was literally a fourth dimension. Not only is that notion now blasé; moreover, it is today even unfashionable to describe a tired old slew of five, or seven, or a few dozen, “dimensions.” One must, instead, propose not only the “multiverse” of dimensions, but also multiple “timelines” and “strings” superseding them. These catchphrases, too, are becoming overly commonplace for those eager to remain on the cutting edge of ET-belief-discourse.

Therefore, talk is also now increasing of a “megaverse” or “superverse” or “holocosm” within which all the relatively puny, old-fashioned multiverses dwell. And who knows what phrases they will invent tomorrow to pretend that they have expanded “The All” to yet another level of empty esoteric abstraction. The only thing we can be certain of is that whatever it is, it will be pure fantasy. There is no difference between the proponents of these ideas and children arguing about who can describe a bigger number, with iterations of the latter’s debate consisting in exchanges of shouts: “infinity!,” “well, infinity plus one!,” “okay, infinity times infinity!,” “Oh yeah!? Infinity times infinity times infinity,” “That’s nothing! Infinity times infinity times infinity times infinity!,” and so on. An adult should walk into the room and tell the children to brush their teeth, say their prayers, and go to bed.

A wise man will simply step back not only from individual claims like those above, but also from the entire discussion itself, and realize that the whole matter is ridiculous. Unfortunately, however, we are not only dealing here with comical absurdities presented by pundits desperate for attention. Propositions like the “Interdimensional Hypothesis” and the “Multiverse Theory” are nothing other than Trojan Horses to beguile the masses into accepting the ministrations of demons without conceding that it is indeed the fundamentally nefarious, spiritual entities—described accurately by Christian Revelation—who are at work; beings whose sole objective is the eternal damnation of souls.

We can no longer remain within the boundaries of scientific analysis. The time has come to delve into considering the outright demonic plans afoot in ET promotion. Accordingly, we must now proceed to the next part of this book.

“...theoretical physics [is descending] into increasingly fantastical speculation, disconnected from the reality that we can access empirically. ...[for example,] string theory...postulates the existence of particles that are far too small to be detected in any conceivable experiment. ... Multiverse theories aren’t theories—they’re science fictions... works of the imagination unconstrained by evidence ... multiverse theories strike me as not only unscientific but also immoral...” —John Horgan, Scientific American.[194]

The science behind a multiverse and folding of time is unsustainable and turns Interdimentional UFO theory into more of a religion, than a science.