The Protestant Reformation

An orthodox Christian emailed us and said the Protestant Reformation was more of the same as the great Schism. He challenges us that Reformers were glad to leave the Church.

Wasn't the Protestant split the fault of the Catholics

Later, as you also know, people grew unhappy with the Catholic Church and a reform led by Martin Luther occurred

It's true we had some bad Popes around that time. But it was not really a reform, but an introduction of novel heresy at the hands of what we today would call a bunch of liberal university professors. Luther would never have succeeded at anything if he was not backed by Prince Frederick of Saxony, who liked Luther's anti-Papal ideas because they served to undermine Prince Frederick's obligations to the King of Germany, who was also the Holy Roman Emperor. For, the authority to be Holy Roman Emperor came from the Pope (who had to crown him), and if Christ did not recognize a Papacy (as Luther said) then the Holy Roman Emperor / King of Germany had no authority over Prince Frederick to ask for taxes from him, and so Frederick could rule Saxony as he pleased. And many other German princes followed Frederick's example to gain their political independence from the German king as well, and THIS is how northern Germany (along with Sweden and Norway) became Lutheran. It was not the common people's idea. And the same is true of Protestant England. The common people in all these places wanted to remain Catholic, but were forced by law to become Protestants.  Dr. Eamon Duffy, for example, has written an excellent and very well documented book about the Protestant take-over of England called "The Stipping of the Altars," which illustrates in great detail how the common people tried their best to remain Catholic.  

And :The Stipping of the Altars," which illustrates in great detail how the common people tried their best to remain Catholic, and there was no sense whatsoever that the Catholic Church was "corrupt" or needed "reform."  Then tell me why they did so willingly.

They didn’t. The common people in the Middle Ages and Renaissance period had to obey their secular rulers, who could impose a religion on them. This is what happened.

Many did not like the Catholic Church,

 Says who?  Where’s your historical evidence for this?  You don’t have any. You are just repeating what you have been told; but what you have been told is wrong.  It’s Protestant propaganda. The real historical evidence reveals otherwise. 

and there were many false teachings circulating among its people in those days (remember Luther’s 95 theses?).

There were some abuses in the Church, yes. Luther was correct to condemn some of them (he was incorrect about others). But, there were many committed Catholics (e.g. Erasmus, St. Thomas More, St. Teresa of ├â´┐Żvila, etc.) who spoke out against abuses without denying the truths of the Catholic Faith, as Luther did. 

Many people reformed willingly.

Many accepted the agenda of the so-called “Reformers” because they were told to by their superiors (e.g. Prince Frederick of Saxony, who was Luther’s patron; King Henry VIII, etc.); and this was sold as “reform,” when it was really heresy. The vast majority of people, however, wanted to retain their Catholic faith and its traditions and observations, and the so-called Reformers had a very hard time taking these away from the common people. It was a slow weaning process. That’s why early Lutheranism, and especially early Anglicanism, looked very “Catholic” by outward appearances.

Some were forced, most were not. Later, there was even a reform in the Catholic Church. 

There was no “reform” in the Catholic Church. Rather, there was what was called a Counter-Reformation in which the Church formally responded to the errors of the so-called Reformers (see the Council of Trent).  In this process, the Church did get rid of several abusive PRACTICES (NOT teachings) which the Protestants used to advance their causes. But, even while there were abuses, the Catholic Church never advocated these abuses or taught that they were right to do. 

Charis kai eirene / Slava Isusu Christu!

Mark Bonocore, edited by Hugh

Lord Jesus, let Your prayer of unity for Christians
become a reality, in Your way.
We have absolute confidence
that you can bring your people together,
we give you absolute permission to move.
Amen


Show all Catholic/Orthodox topics
  1. Home
  2. Orthodox/Catholic Timeline
  3. Discussion on the Pope, the Bishop of Rome
  4. Filioque
  5. Married Priests
  6. Why more books in the Orthodox Bible than the Catholic Bible?
  7. Holy Fire
  8. Decomposed bodies of Saints
  9. Mary's Assumption
  10. Immaculate Conception
  11. Was Peter the Rock?
  12. Nicene Creed Text
  13. Purgatory
  14. Purgatory dialogue with an Orthodox Christian
  15. Does the Orthodox Church predate the Catholic Church?
  16. The Orthodox Bible. Did the Council of Nicea II confirm the Council of Carthage
  17. The 1054 Split between Catholic and Orthodox
  18. Orthodox position on divorce
  19. Orthodox position on Contraception
  20. The Crusade sack of Constantinople
  21. Did the Apostle Andrew establish the Church in Constantinople?
  22. Why can't babies receive communion in the Catholic Church?
  23. Why can Orthodox Christians receive Catholic Communion but Catholics can't receive Orthodox Communion?
  24. The history of the Church in Bulgaria
  25. Protestant Reformation
  26. Heresies - listed
  27. Has the Orthodox Church changed on significant issues?
  28. If Peter had primacy, why did James make decision (Acts 15)?
  29. Is Papal infallibility a "one man council"?
  30. Is Peter the Rock of Matthew 16:18?
  31. Are the other Patriarchs dependent on Rome?
  32. Did Rome force Latin on the Eastern Churches?
  33. Why did the Pope have a Kingdom?
  34. Evangelicals becoming Orthodox
  35. Did Catholics force "Mortal Sin" on eastern churches?